I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
也就是说，无论厂商在广告中告诉消费者他们的L3如何智能，目前能上路测试的唯二两款路试车，深蓝和极狐，也只有这两个场景落地。而这两个场景，哪怕是仅售15万的比亚迪也能完成得很好，不需要太高算力。厂商们准备的数千算力超级芯片没了用武之地，如何说服消费者花更多溢价购买？
。关于这个话题，夫子提供了深入分析
更多精彩内容，关注钛媒体微信号（ID：taimeiti），或者下载钛媒体App。关于这个话题，WPS下载最新地址提供了深入分析
The mission came hours after the first flight of the Blue Origin New Glenn rocket system, backed by Amazon boss Jeff Bezos.。Line官方版本下载对此有专业解读